AOR ONE™ CARE AUTHORITY™

Sectors served

The same operating picture, framed around what each organization is accountable for.

Health plans & Medicare Advantage

Problem: Limited visibility into what happens to a member between authorization events.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Consolidated case status, deadline tracking, appeal documentation and traceable coordination.
Expected operational outcome: Fewer unattended cases and a documented administrative trail per member.

Request a demonstration

Hospitals & discharge teams

Problem: Patients leave the facility and follow-up ownership dissolves.
CARE AUTHORITY™: 72-hour semaphore with named owners, pending interventions and escalation on lapse.
Expected operational outcome: Transitions that are visible, owned and documented rather than assumed.

Request a demonstration

Physician groups

Problem: Administrative burden pulls clinicians away from patients.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Authorization pipeline, document checklists and drafting assistance with human review.
Expected operational outcome: Less administrative rework and clearer case ownership.

Request a demonstration

Wound care organizations

Problem: Complex, long-duration cases with heavy documentation demands.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Longitudinal case coordination, evidence organization and appeal preparation support.
Expected operational outcome: Continuity of treatment supported by an organized documentary record.

Request a demonstration

Home health agencies

Problem: Field visits, supplies and authorizations are tracked in separate places.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Field visit capture with offline queue, task pressure views and DME coordination.
Expected operational outcome: Field reality and office records stay aligned.

Request a demonstration

Skilled nursing facilities

Problem: Transitions in and out of the facility lack a shared operational record.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Case handoffs, pending activities and documented closure per transition.
Expected operational outcome: Cleaner handoffs and fewer unresolved items at discharge.

Request a demonstration

DME suppliers

Problem: Delivery delays surface only when treatment has already been interrupted.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Order status, delayed-case exceptions, receipt confirmation and supplier follow-up.
Expected operational outcome: Delays identified while they can still be corrected.

Request a demonstration

Case management organizations

Problem: Coordination across entities happens over phone, fax and email with no trail.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Shared case surface with owners, timelines, escalations and audit history.
Expected operational outcome: Coordination that can be reconstructed and reviewed.

Request a demonstration

Compliance & regulatory teams

Problem: Operational actions are hard to evidence after the fact.
CARE AUTHORITY™: Append-only audit logging, role-scoped access and documented escalation paths.
Expected operational outcome: Reviewable evidence of what the operation actually did.

Request a demonstration

Enterprise use cases

All scenarios are illustrative. They do not describe real patients, real organizations or real outcomes.

1 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Hospital discharge and 72-hour transition

Context: A high-risk patient is discharged on a Friday afternoon.
Problem: The follow-up window closes before anyone is assigned to the case.
Modules involved: 72-Hour Semaphore · Patients · Tasks · Regulatory Escalation
Coordinated actions: The case enters the semaphore, an owner is assigned, pending interventions are listed, and escalation fires if the window lapses.
Expected operational outcome: A transition that is owned, timed and documented instead of assumed.

2 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Wound care authorization delayed

Context: An advanced wound therapy request sits unattended in the pipeline.
Problem: The deadline approaches with documentation still incomplete.
Modules involved: Authorizations · Document Vault · AI Copilot
Coordinated actions: The request is flagged, the missing document checklist is surfaced, and a draft submission package is prepared for human review.
Expected operational outcome: The request is completed and submitted before the deadline. Approval is never guaranteed.

3 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

DME delivery affecting treatment continuity

Context: Ordered supplies have not been confirmed as received.
Problem: Treatment cannot proceed without the equipment.
Modules involved: DME Control Tower · Tasks · Vendors
Coordinated actions: The order appears as a delayed exception, the supplier is followed up, and receipt confirmation is recorded.
Expected operational outcome: Interruption risk identified while it is still correctable.

4 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Appeal requiring organized documentation

Context: A service has been denied and an appeal deadline applies.
Problem: Evidence is scattered and the filing window is short.
Modules involved: Appeals · Compliance · Document Vault
Coordinated actions: The denial is registered, the case file is assembled, a letter is drafted from a payer-specific template, and an authorized reviewer approves it.
Expected operational outcome: A complete, traceable appeal package. This is administrative support, not legal representation.

5 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Patient moving between Puerto Rico and Florida

Context: A patient relocates mid-treatment across the corridor.
Problem: Providers, networks and documentation change at once.
Modules involved: Snowbird Continuity · Patients · Authorizations
Coordinated actions: The corridor transfer is coordinated, documentation follows the case, and coverage items are flagged for verification with the plan.
Expected operational outcome: Continuity of coordination. Coverage across jurisdictions is verified, never assumed.

6 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Executive oversight of high-risk workflows

Context: Leadership needs to know where the operation is exposed.
Problem: Exposure is spread across modules and teams.
Modules involved: Command Center · AOR Aegis · Reports
Coordinated actions: Executive metrics consolidate transitions, authorizations, deliveries, escalations and overdue tasks in one view with export.
Expected operational outcome: Operational exposure that can be seen, discussed and assigned.

7 · Illustrative example — synthetic data

Compliance review of operational actions

Context: A compliance officer reviews how a case was handled.
Problem: Actions must be reconstructed accurately after the fact.
Modules involved: Audit Log · Compliance · Incidents
Coordinated actions: Append-only audit entries, access logs and escalation history are reviewed and exported.
Expected operational outcome: Reviewable evidence of the operation's actual behavior.

Operational outcomes tracked

These are the indicators the platform measures. Any figure shown in the demonstration environment is synthetic and illustrative; CARE AUTHORITY makes no claim of clinical improvement, readmission reduction or financial result without validated methodology and evidence.

Transitions requiring intervention
Time from discharge to first documented contact
Pending authorizations
Authorizations past deadline
Delayed DME deliveries
Incomplete documentation
Pending appeals
Escalated cases
Overdue tasks
Coordinated PR ↔ FL cases
Documented closures
Response times
Internal SLA adherence
Alerts resolved

Tell us about your operation and we will schedule a guided walkthrough of the command center using synthetic demonstration data.

Request a demonstration

Coverage, authorization and reimbursement depend on the patient's benefit plan, applicable policy, medical necessity, network status, documentation and governing requirements. No payment or approval is guaranteed.